Healthy Planet UK
  • Home
  • About us
  • Our goals
    • Lifestyles
    • Curriculums
    • Schools
    • Political
  • Branches
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact us

8/5/2015

A new Conservative government in the UK - what will it mean for the climate?

0 Comments

Read Now
 
With the UK waking up to a new Conservative majority government, many are turning to a question neglected throughout all the parties' campaigning - what will the new government mean for climate and the environment? From our review of the manifestos, we could expect: a crippling blow to the onshore wind industry paired with a boost for North Sea oil and gas, flagwaving for fracking (perhaps tempered by campaign-trail animosity), and a heavy commitment to new nuclear. For transport, they bet the farm on electrification of motorised vehicles over investing in active transport infrastructure; and internationally, a pledge to work towards an international deal making 2C achievable could be compromised by EU in/out uncertainty. Here, we've collected a few thoughts from experts across the UK:

  • The overwhelming impression given by those Carbon Brief spoke to is that a Tory government will stick on the course set by previous governments - adhering to the Climate Change Act, remaining with their Valentine's Day commitment to end unabated coal, but backing fracking and North Sea fossils - but do no more. Opinions differ as to whether Cameron will be more or less beholden to his climate-sceptic back benchers than under the Coalition government.
  • Greenpeace's EnergyDesk concludes it's "unlikely to be great news for the planet - or its inhabitants." They fear a loss of investment in renewables, a failure to commit to the domestic energy efficiency improvements needed to overcome the dual problem of high heating-related emissions and fuel poverty, and the loss of the stronger Coalition voices like the Lib Dems' Ed Davey (who lost his seat in Parliament last night) from the international negotiating table.
  • Damian Carrington at the Guardian reiterates the others' concerns over the likely energy mix favoured by the Tories, and further raises concerns about their antagonism towards regulation of bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides, but does at least sound a note of hope for the local environment (in the short term at least), narrating their manifesto commitments to marine and rural conservation and green space expansion.
  • James Murray of BusinessGreen weighs up whether we can expect "competence or chaos" on the climate, noting that the former will require "nerve, authority, and political nous" from the more scientifically-literate end of the Conservative party in the face of back-bench denialism. He does, however, argue that the renewable economy is flourishing and may be allowed to develop further with five years of political stability - despite the threats posed to renewables investment by Tory energy policy.
  • On Twitter, Lord Deben has perhaps the most succinct summary of what Tory attempts to stick to decarbonisation goals while appeasing their core vote and right wing may mean - a commitment to decarbonisation; "it will simply cost more than necessary.
Despite the future of UK politics for the next five years becoming clearer this morning, the future of the UK's climate and environment policy is scarcely any less murky. But climate and environmental health threats do not act in isolation - they serve to exacerbate the problems of social deprivation, fuel poverty, malnutrition, an obesogenic environment, weak public health legislation, and a changing health services. It is perhaps in these areas that our new government will make its presence most felt. Healthy Planet will keep working to pressure our government to put the health of our communities and the environment on which they depend at the forefront of all policy decisions. If you want to do the same, join us and the rest of the Climate Coalition in lobbying our new MPs for government fit for the future.


Share

0 Comments
Details

    Archives

    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    August 2014
    June 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    August 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    February 2011

    Tags

    All
    Aid
    Air Pollution
    Arctic Ice Melt
    Austerity
    Biodiversity
    Biofuels
    Bonn Intersessionals
    Campaigns
    Carbon
    Catastrophes
    Cities
    Citizen Science
    Cleanmed
    Climate
    Coal
    Cop17
    Cop19
    Determinants Of Health
    Drought
    Durban
    Economy
    Education
    Energy
    Environmental Justice
    Equity
    Ethics
    Family Planning
    Food
    Fossil Fuel Industry
    Fracking
    Future
    Gender
    Health
    Healthcare
    Health Policy
    Hunger
    Hurricanes
    If Campaign
    Ifmsa
    Insurance
    Land
    Lifestyle Change
    Lobbying
    Malnutrition
    Mapping
    Meat
    Medical Education
    Methane
    Migration
    Mitigation
    Mobilisation
    Motivations
    Nuclear
    Nuclear Waste
    Participation
    Patient-centred Care
    Patient Empowerment
    Permafrost
    Policy
    Population
    Positive Feedbacks
    Reforms
    Rights
    Security
    Shale Gas
    Skepticism/denial
    Solar
    Sustainability
    Sustainable Healthcare
    Tax
    Themes
    Tobacco
    Transparency
    Uk Politics
    Ukycc
    Unfccc
    Un Talks
    Un Talks
    Us
    Weather
    Wind
    Women

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About us
  • Our goals
    • Lifestyles
    • Curriculums
    • Schools
    • Political
  • Branches
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact us