Even amongst the small and highly-biased sample of the world's 7bn+ population likely to read the average Healthy Planet blog, I'd guess that few see themselves as the next HP coordinator. I say this because few of the past HP coordinators I've known saw themselves in that role until, for one reason or another, they ended up occupying it. I certainly couldn't envision it. I've never had the silver tongue or inspiring manner of a feted leader, not even the logistical nous of a good organiser; but, as it turns out, that doesn't really matter. All that really counts for being a great HP coordinator is a passion for fighting for a healthier, fairer future for the environment and humans whose lives depend upon it.
In large part, that's because you'll never be alone or unsupported. HP works with an amazing circle of academic and activist collaborators like Medsin, the IFMSA, Medact, and People and Planet; and through our work with the Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, Climate and Health Council and Sustainable Healthcare Education Network we have access to an impressive network of more experienced academics and clinicians with a wealth of knowledge (and plenty of letters after their names when you need to impress some people in suits). Not to mention our greatest resource - the Healthy Planet network itself.
As a coordinator, you'll be able to work with the networks to decide priorities for education, advocacy and action on climate and health, and work out how best to utilise the voices and abilities of young people to fight for environmental and climate justice. For me, in the year or so running up to the high-profile UN climate negotations at COP21 in Paris, that meant: ramping up our fossil fuel divestment campaigning to ensure the world heard that the business practices of the fossil fuel industry were incompatible with a healthy climate; acting locally on homegrown environmental justice crises like air pollution and fracking; and continuing our work on climate and health in medical education in partnership with Medsin and the Sustainable Healthcare Education Network. Healthcare students can provide a unique perspective on the issues that will define the practice of tomorrow's health workers, and people will call upon HP coordinators to give voice to that perspective - it's taken us to global health and medical education conferences from Glasgow to Barcelona, seen us published in general media like the Guardian and specialist journals like the BMJ, even taken some of us (though alas not me personally, finals getting in the way as they do) to the COP21 talks in Paris.
There are, of course, some tough bits to the role. Activist burnout is always going to be an issue for anyone trying to confront such an all-encompassing structural injustice as climate change, and self-care will play a central role in handover to our successors. Managing a geographically-distributed network with international partnerships can be tricky (if only for trying to timetable group calls across multiple timezones); here the face-to-face contact opportunities provided by our training weekend and conferences run by our Medsin and Medact allies are invaluable in bringing the network together. And, as with most things in the UK, organising can sometimes seem a bit London-centric - but Ele and I have managed from our bases in Sheffield and Edinburgh respectively, and HP at least focuses well beyond the capital, hosting events from Norwich to Aberdeen.
We hope that our successors will be able to make HP a stronger, more unified and tight-knit group, even better able to educate, advocate and act for a fairer, healthier planet. We know you're up to the job - even if you don't yet.
I first started getting involved with climate activism around 2 and a half years ago, after becoming increasingly aware of the crisis we are heading into, and have already began to experience. Since then, things have gotten even worse. As predicted. However, I think the movement that has risen to confront it has got stronger, and being a part of this as Healthy Planet co-ordinator has helped me out of a pretty hard period of depression, and given me hope to keep fighting for a more just world.
From leading fossil free health workshops in Barcelona, to occupying a university building for ten days over their fossil fuel investments, the last 2 years have been pretty incredible. Being part of Healthy Planet has given me so many opportunities to meet other healthcare students interested in this, teach others about climate+health impacts and attend global climate conferences to either take part in the policy making, or protest the policies! It's also helped me when I struggle to find the meaning in memorizing hundreds of drug names and anatomy, as I'm motivated by the importance healthcare professionals have in tackling climate change and social injustice.
We are heading into a crisis, and often I've heard people say, 'It's too late, why bother trying to make a difference?'. I can definitely relate to feeling like that at times, and then I remember all the awesome, life-changing, empowering and invaluable reasons as to why I'm still part of this movement and would encourage others to get involved....
Amplifying people's stories and supporting their struggles is so vital. I'm still learning so much about how to be a genuine ally, but the process so far has been profoundly meaningful.
I look forward to supporting the new Healthy Planet national committee, and am excited about what we can achieve over the next year!
World leaders have been gathered in Paris from 1st-12th December to construct a global agreement on climate change. There has been a long build up to this, and much expectation. On December the 12th, the Paris agreement was officially adopted.
So what's in the agreement?
A few highlights...
The agreement aims to pursue emission reductions from 2020 that would be in line with limiting temperature rise to 1.5 degrees. Civil society groups have been campaigning hard to get 1.5 degrees in the text. For many countries, such as the Marshall Islands in the Pacific and Bangladesh, any rise above 1.5 degrees could see their communities completely submerged by sea level rise. However, the text falls desperately short of recognising and revering the lives of these communities considering the lack of mechanism or strategy to achieve a target well below 2 degrees. Countries have only committed to voluntary declarations of carbon emission reductions outlined in their INDCs (individual countries plans for decarbonisation). Considering the commitments of the INDC’s add up to a 2.7-3.5 degree of warming, this is really not good enough. James Henson, the famous NASA scientist, who has been deemed as an important kickstarter of the UN climate negotiations, said “It’s just b******t for them to say: ‘We’ll have a 2C warming target and then try to do a little better every five years.’ It’s just worthless words. There is no action, just promises.” This is based on the method in which these emission reductions are set to be monitored, through “facilitative, non-intrusive and non-punitive” follow up every 5 years from 2023. Considering the immense lobbying power of the fossil fuel industry, and the world organisations that are profiting from fossil fuel infrastructure over renewables, the incentive to decarbonise based on voluntary commitments is slim.
“As long as fossil fuels appear to be the cheapest fuels out there, they will be continued to be burned.” continues James Henson.
It also states the responsibility of richer nations to help the world's poorest nations to adapt to the effects of climate change and leapfrog unhealthy fossil fuel development, towards sustainable clean renewable alternatives. This is in the form of $100 billion pledged each year by 2020. However, this is an arbitrary figure, and the specification of where this money is to go is left vague. That means that it could go towards making coal powered plants more “efficient” and “green” as much as it could go towards funding community owned renewable energy. This puts us in conflict yet again with the fossil fuel lobby who will do everything they can to try and persuade us that fossil fuels are good for us (remember this attempt to undermine the divestment campaign?)
...So the outcome of the Paris climate agreement may seem bleak in terms of achieving the level and pace of decarbonisation needed to prevent climate chaos, however in the words of Jess Worth and Danny Chivers, from the New Internationalist, “To say that this is a bad deal is not giving in to despair. It is opening the door to a different kind of hope ... We need to take our dreams away from politicians and invest them in ourselves. Through our own actions, we can make fossil fuels politically, economically, physically impossible to extract.”
What have the health community been up to?
The health community had a much more prominent platform at COP21 then they ever have, with the genesis of the Global Climate and Health Alliance, working alongside the WHO, IFMSA, HEAL, and others creating significant avenues for the health community to take action and provide essential mitigation and adaptation strategies that will also provide solutions to current public health crisis.
The 5th December saw an alliance representing 1700 health organisations, 8200 hospitals and health facilities and 13 million health professionals bringing a global medical consensus to action on climate change.
“Climate change, and all of its dire consequences for health, should be at centre-stage, right now, whenever talk turns to the future of human civilizations. After all, that’s what’s at stake.” Dr Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization
They gave the damning evidence that failure to act on climate change would lead to a reversal of the last 50 years of gains in public health. This outlines the importance of the health community to be at the forefront of climate resilience, adaptation and mitigation, as well as taking the lead in ensuring health systems are able to withstand the impacts of climate change. There was also an event put together in coalition with the Lancet, The Rockefeller foundation and Wellcome Trust which gave an overview of “Healthy Lives on a Healthy Planet” and saw the presentation of a wealth of research that provides a substantial platform to build stronger and effective policy on climate change and health. It is clear that we need to be taking the lead on the benefits of kicking our societal addiction to fossil fuels and recreating an economic, social and political system that provides the health benefits we so urgently need.
There was also significant success in bringing air pollution to the forefront of climate mitigation strategies. The Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) – a partnership of governments, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and other organizations managed to accelerate action to reduce short lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). SLCP’s, which include greenhouse gas methane and particles from combustion called black carbon or PM2.3 (particulate matter smaller than 2.4 micrometers) are important for reducing air pollution and climate change. An increase in these pollutants have been significant in the rise in smog, most visibly seen in parts of China where a red alert was issued in Beijing last week. Thus, putting air pollution at the forefront of climate action is an important step.
“As doctors, it is our role to protect health by drawing political leaders’ attention to the impacts of climate change and to promote health by advocating for local solutions such as cycle-friendly cities and clean, renewable energy. Millions of physicians around the world demand that the global community leave Paris with a strong agreement that protects global health.” Dr Xavier Deau, Immediate Past President, World Medical Association
The red lines that cannot be crossed
The work of the health community at COP21 only signals the beginning, with the challenge now being to turn these declarations into action, and creating tangible and visible climate and health action in our communities. So whilst politicians from these 195 countries tried to sort out a deal inside the walls of the summit, it was the people outside of the two-week long summit, in the streets of Paris, who were the loudest voices. 'D12', held on the 12th of December, the final day of COP21, Healthy Planet joined Medact, the Global Climate and Health and Climate Alliance and more than 15,000 people from across the world in gathering between l'arc de Triomphe and the Eiffel Tower to represent the voice of the communities most affected by our changing climate.
The tragic terrorist attacks which occurred near Place de la Republique in Paris last week meant the French government had understandably declared a state of emergency in Paris. However, COP has never just been about what goes on inside the conference, and due to the lack of accessibility of civil society and the global climate movement to make their voices heard inside the conference, millions had intended to take to the streets during the last day of talks. This seemed even more pertinent after the terrorist attacks, given the interconnections of climate change with conflict, migration and the need to build a future away from oil driven war and towards climate justice. Many see the the new climate deal as an essential step in peace-building, and thus the demonstration on Saturday were finally approved by the government to go ahead. Although the original more radical plans for civil disobedience were overted, we still joined over 15,000 people on the streets in an act of defiance and a signal for system change not climate change, holding up long red banners symbolising the red lines that COP’s inaction on climate change had already crossed.
We also attended an action led by indigenous peoples as part of the Indigenous Environmental Network who held a healing ceremony in the morning, lifting up the voices of their communities - whose bodies are already red lines that have been crossed. Every time someone gets displaced, is poisoned near an extraction site, loses access to their land and water, has fracking imposed on their community, and experiences the dismissal of Indigenous voices and struggles, our Red Lines are crossed. For many keeping fossil fuels in the ground is a decision of life and death.“It's worth pausing to know this: we do negotiate the right of entire countries to exist” says Naomi Klein, environmental journalist and author.
So where next?
The science is clear that if we have any chance of staying below 2 degrees we need to leave 80-90% of current fossil fuels held in fossil fuel companies reserves underground. However,‘Fossil fuels’, ‘oil’, ‘gas’ or ‘coal’ are not even mentioned in the agreement. All countries have to do is be transparent about their country's actions in reducing emissions - it really is now up to us to organise, mobilise and take action to keep fossil fuels in the ground!
2016 holds many exciting plans for Healthy Planet and our allies in the climate and health movement. Starting with Go Green Week from the 8th-13th February, where Healthy Planet will be working with fossil free groups from around the UK to draw our red lines - calling out health institutions ties with the fossil fuel industry and the health impact this has on communities around the world, and on their doorstep. To start preparing download an action pack here. This will then lead into a weekend of community building, skill sharing and strategizing at the Healthy Planet training weekend taking place in the Peak District on 5-6th March. Join the event page for more details here. We will be continuing to pressurise health institutions to take the lead with divestment, as well as building resilience and mitigation strategies for decarbonisation in our communities, ensuring that health is at the heart of climate action and used as a motivator for a just transition towards a fossil free future.
“Time will reveal the true nature of the Paris Agreement. From epic turning point, to naïve expression of hope, it is the real-world actions that follow that will decide,” said Professor Chris Rapley, a leading climate scientist from University College London.
This post was written by Tahmina Parveen of UEA Healthy Planet following their university debate on fossil fuel divestment, organised by the Healthy Planet Branch last month. Find out more about UEA Healthy Planet and get involved at their Facebook and Twitter pages.
UEA Healthy Planet hosted a debate putting forward arguments from six panelists from different backgrounds, proposing answers to the question: ‘Should UEA cut ties with the fossil fuel industry’ on the 22nd October. The rationale behind this debate is because UEA is well known for its research in climate change, however this institution has over £130,000 invested in fossil fuel companies, including Shell and BG group.
Dr. David Pencheon, the Director of the NHS Sustainable Development Unit, proposes that unless health systems and universities show big symbolic signs that something is ethically, health-wise and financially undesirable, we will be perpetuating it. Chris Jarvis, UEA Student Union’s Campaigns and Democracy Officer, reiterates Dr Pencheon’s perspective, claiming that divestment represents a more profound and symbolic change. He outlines that it is hypocritical for an institution that wants to continue its reputation as progressive, to exacerbate the worst aspects of climate change by investing in the fossil fuel industry. Emma Silk, UEA Environmental Sciences graduate and former Fossil Free campaigner, emphasised a point of hypocrisy. As an institution that is one of the leaders in climate change and environmental sciences research, how can UEA fund the industry that is doing the most damage? Furthermore, UEA has justified its inaction by stating that their investment are made into “sustainable and ethically appropriate funds,” however, these companies are notorious for their disregard of human rights and environmental abuse. Brett Scott, a financial activist questions the “risk and return” ideology of traditional finance. He argues that high returns do not justify the “undermining of ecological stability and humankind.” Historically, protests have been shown to be effective in forcing the industries to change, it is a resource that we must exploit in order to build a progressive society. UEA economics lecturer, Dr Fabio Arico pushed his pro-divestment view in which he stated that the most important role of this institution is to improve education and innovation. He believes that the university is unable to afford the cost of divestment and that students and UEA as a whole would be better off looking at a different take on being environmentally friendly.
The event was closed by a few more statements from each member of the panel. Jarvis’ statement struck a resounding chord among the audience as he concluded by saying that “money being invested in the fossil fuel industry is your [students’] money you pay into the university in your tuition fees. Together, we can make sure this issue won’t go away.” To continue our support of action for climate change, we are looking forward to the People’s March in London and the COP21 in Paris in the upcoming weeks
Our current profit-driven fossil-fuelled energy system is a killer. Climate change is leading to untold suffering, devastation and death across the world. Closer to home, this energy system is harming people too - the most drafty housing stock in Europe, combined with unaffordable energy prices, leaves millions of people in the UK shivering throughout the winter.
Along with being linked to detrimental impacts on mental health, there is a longstanding body of evidence to show that living in a cold, damp, drafty home leads to devastating effects on physical health, such as causing and worsening cardiovascular and respiratory disease, killing thousands of pensioners and other more vulnerable people every winter. The figures announced this November are expected to the highest in fifteen years- but these deaths are preventable.
A drafty home is a home that requires more energy to heat, so The Big Six energy companies, who control over 90% of the market in the UK, have a huge vested interest in keeping them drafty and keeping energy bills high. In December 2013 British Gas lobbied hard for a £50 per household reduction in the ‘green levies’ which paid for free home insulation for the most fuel-poor households and supported renewable energy. This ‘reduction’ meant that they put their prices up by £83 rather than the £123 rise they had planned to implement in January 2014. The profits of their parent company Centrica stood at £1.58bn in 2013.
Fuel Poverty Action fights for an energy system that could be very different. FPA is a grassroots London-based campaign and support organisation that has been fighting for an energy system built on the premise of meeting people’s needs - insulating millions of homes for free, investing in renewable energy and breaking our addiction to fossil fuels. This will result in lower energy prices, warmer homes and reduced carbon emissions. The positive impact that such an energy system would have on our health is clear.
FPA also supports people struggling with their bills in the here and now through advice and advocacy on energy debt.
Fuel poverty is also a ‘bridge’ issue- between climate change, energy injustice and austerity. For many people, climate change comes a long way down the list of daily worries - worries about feeding the children, keeping the debt collector from the door, fighting sanctions from the job centre. We can’t expect people to automatically have any kind of emotional connection to the concept of climate change when it feels so remote compared to thing such as austerity policies, which are so brutally impacting the everyday. People know that the energy companies are not acting in their interests because they have to pay bills which are impoverishing. However, starting from this point makes it a lot easier to engage with people on issues of energy injustice.
Over the last few years FPA has made important gains. We started out by building a diverse coalition of groups who now work and campaign together- from ESOL students and those campaigning for asylum rights and local energy co-ops, to housing and pensioner groups. It’s not often that protests are lead by pensioners, but ours are, and with that we are able to push back against the media narrative that pensioners are simply passive victims of fuel poverty and instead show they are some of the most active and serious campaigners on the issue. We have been successful in achieving widespread media attention. Whilst Jeremy Corbyn has pushed the issue of energy renationalisation up the political agenda in the last month, we have spent years challenging the current energy system and suggesting publicly owned energy in dozens of mainstream media appearances on TV and in national newspapers, keeping the debates on energy ownership alive. We have had big successes supporting individuals in energy debt and have delivered training so that people are empowered to resolve their own situation with their energy provider.
If you are interested in getting involved with Fuel Poverty Action there are a few areas we need support with, such as research (there are dozens of reports on energy democracy to fuel poverty), helping us to promote and distribute our ‘In trouble with your energy company? Know Your Rights’ cards and guides to community groups, becoming a ‘Know Your Rights’ trainer, getting involved in organising the action against deaths from fuel poverty at the end of November, translating our Know Your Rights resources and much more!
If you are interested, please get in touch.
As part of our climate change and health education work, Healthy Planet is part of the Sustainable Healthcare Education Network - a group of healthcare professionals and educators working to empower healthcare students to address climate change and sustainability in their working environments through sustainable healthcare education. The following is a guest post from the Network coordinators.
Are you concerned about climate change or the environmental footprint of our health service? Do you know what health professionals can do in their professional lives to address these issues?Do you think that your medical curriculum could teach you more about these topics? The Sustainable Healthcare Education network needs your help!
We are developing networks of students and staff in medical schools across the UK. Since 2009, we have developed and implemented teaching materials about health and the environment for medical students, carried out a national consultation on learning objectives for UK medical students and run workshops and training for educators across the UK.
We are looking for a student representative and student network members. Get in touch if you think this could be you! There is also an opportunity in September for five medical schools to join a programme to support the development of a Sustainable Healthcare Education team and new teaching. Any medical school that would like to attend must send at least one student and one staff representative and commit to follow up work (such as providing a teaching session, evaluating new teaching and engaging with the national network) during the academic year 2015-2016. If you would like your medical school to be involved, contact email@example.com to see if there are already staff reps at your school.
The 1st June marks the beginning of 2 weeks of UNFCCC negotiations held in Bonn, where Healthy Planet will be part of the IFMSA delegation focusing on ADP2.9 (Ad Hoc working group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action). Success in COP20 in Lima and ADP 2.8 means that health co-benefits now feature in the draft text, however, with a lot of cuts expected to be made in order to construct an appropriate text for Paris, there is still a lot of work in ensuring health remains a priority.
What is the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action….?
The ADP was set up at COP17 in Durban in 2011. It’s main mandate is to construct a protocol with legal force by 2015 which will be implemented by 2020. It is split into 2 main areas - workstream 1 and workstream 2. Workstream 1 is concerned with the architecture of the 2020 agreement - considering factors such as the legally binding nature and how emissions will be measured, reviewed and verified (MRVs). Workstream 2 looks at how to close the emissions gap, which is the current gap between scientific targets and countries emission reduction commitments (which is worryingly large!) Mitigation targets are currently defined using some more lovely acronyms - NAMA and MRV - with NAMA standing for Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions, which are emissions targets for developing countries and MRV for Measurable Reportable and Verifiable targets to ensure greater accountability for the higher emitters in the developed world.
The IFMSA delegation will be working with other organizations dealing with health and climate change including the WHO, YOUNGO and Healthcare without Harm to reinforce the message that climate change is both a health emergency and a tremendous opportunity to improve population health. We will be promoting our policy brief which outlines the main areas in the ADP text in which health impacts and health co-benefits should be reinforced.
ADP 2.9 comes at a time when the impacts of climate change are more stark than ever, and it is clear urgent action must be prioritized leading up to the implementation of a global agreement in 2020. The recent earthquake in Nepal, which killed over 8000 people, is one of very few earthquakes to be attributed to melting glaciers and changing weather patterns due to climate change disrupting the integrity of the Earth’s structure. Some of the worst droughts in history are currently being experienced in California, destroying agricultural livelihoods and threatening food and water security for millions of people. These impacts are only going to get worse, thus during these 2 weeks
With the World Health Assembly passing a resolution to cut fossil fuel use due to the public health impacts of air pollution, China rapidly transitioning to renewables due to devastating health impacts of air pollution and Barack Obama putting public health at the core of his climate change message in April, there is reason to hope that climate and health will feature more prominently than ever in the upcoming weeks in Bonn and continue building momentum in the lead up to Paris and beyond.
With the UK waking up to a new Conservative majority government, many are turning to a question neglected throughout all the parties' campaigning - what will the new government mean for climate and the environment? From our review of the manifestos, we could expect: a crippling blow to the onshore wind industry paired with a boost for North Sea oil and gas, flagwaving for fracking (perhaps tempered by campaign-trail animosity), and a heavy commitment to new nuclear. For transport, they bet the farm on electrification of motorised vehicles over investing in active transport infrastructure; and internationally, a pledge to work towards an international deal making 2C achievable could be compromised by EU in/out uncertainty. Here, we've collected a few thoughts from experts across the UK:
This morning the Guardian newspaper published an open letter from medical students worldwide calling on the health sector, in particular the Wellcome Trust and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to divest from the fossil fuel industry. It's no surprise that we're signatories; but we're small fry compared to the others - the International Federation of Medical Students' Associations (IFMSA), the Australian Medical Students' Association (AMSA), the Canadian Federation of Medical Students Global Health Programme, Medsin, and Doctors for the Environment Australia, to name a few.
You may have noticed a running theme in the posts on the HPblog recently; we’ve been working a lot on divestment – convincing the health sector to stop funding the companies driving climate change, and instead to take its commitment to ‘do no harm’ seriously and move its money towards those working to achieve the energy transition our planet and our health requires. Health sector divestment has taken a huge step forward in the past month, since the Guardian newspaper launched its ‘Keep it in the Ground’ campaign, calling for divestment from the fossil fuel industry. What’s particularly notable about the campaign is their chosen targets – the two biggest private global health funding organisations in the world, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.
It’s hard for anyone with more than a passing interest in global health to criticise the Wellcome Trust; Wellcome-funded research has achieved extraordinary advances in healthcare. They are more willing than others to fund research involving higher levels of risk, complexity and uncertainty, an approach typified by their making exploration of the connections between environment, nutrition and health one of their five ‘key challenges’. Moreover, their commitment to transparency – whether in championing open access to scientific research or in making the details of their investments freely available to the public – pervades all the Trust’s actions. But there would be little virtue in such openness if none were willing to challenge them when mistaken. Their stance on continued investment in the fossil fuel industry – as outlined in a recent Guardian article by Director Jeremy Farrar – demands such a challenge.
We agree with much of what Farrar has to say. That climate change, as one of the greatest threats to global health of the 21st century, demands concerted action from health organisations. That this requires a commitment to a rapid decarbonisation of the global economy in order to remain within a 2C warming carbon budget. And that consideration of the impacts on human health and wellbeing need to be at the forefront in planning a just and sustainable transition. However, where we disagree is in the role of fossil fuels – and the fossil fuel industry – in making that transition.
He also proposes that it is from within the fossil fuel industry that the necessary decarbonisation will come, and the best way to achieve that is from within, as an active and engaged shareholder. But it is difficult to see how shareholder engagement alone could bring about the scale of transition needed with the required urgency (the IPCC’s 2C carbon budget will be exhausted by 2036 at current rates). Health institutions, more than any other organisations, should be aware that businesses stop responding to shareholder engagement when that engagement challenges the very core of their business model – it’s why it failed with the tobacco industry, and why it’s failing now with fossil fuels. Farrar is optimistic about the role of fossil fuels in a low-carbon economy – citing natural gas and carbon capture and storage as central components – but it is hard to reconcile this position with evidence that half of already-known gas reserves will have to remain unburned to stay under 2C, and that CCS will do nothing to alleviate the health burden of particulate air pollution.
Nonetheless, selective engagement may have its place alongside divestment. But it is only possible with companies who display a realistic commitment to keeping warming under 2C – one that moves beyond words. We applaud the Trust’s acknowledgement of the inconsistency of coal and tar sands development with a healthy climate. But so too is pursuing Arctic drilling, not to mention funding attempts to undermine climate science or legislative efforts on mitigation policy – of which companies in which the Trust invests are guilty. For companies that fall short of the required action, divestment must follow.
While we focus here on the Wellcome Trust, that is only because their commitment to public debate permits us to engage in this conversation. The same arguments apply to all health sector organisations, who share the same responsibilities for health of people and planet alike.
If, like us, you're convinced that it's time for health organisations to ditch their dirty investments, here are a few things you can do:
In our previous blog, we discussed the historical origins of and ethical judgements behind the 2C warming goal in international climate policy, and what 2C of warming would mean for global health. These theoretical issues aside, the 2C bottom line occupies a powerful position in climate organising, because it issues an unambiguous call to action. Limiting surface temperature increase to 2C above pre-industrial averages, as the majority of national governments worldwide are committed to, demands prompt and drastic action – and now is the Time to Act.
These were some of the concerns that brought a contingent of HP, Medsin, and other sympathetic types to the Time to Act! march last Saturday afternoon. We joined over 20,000 others from across the country, supporting a host of different causes – warm homes, green jobs, environmental justice or just the space to ride a bike – united by the acknowledgement that all of these would play a small part in transforming our society to protect it from the worst excesses of climate change. Medics can be unwilling to get too involved with grassroots campaigning, preferring to retain a professional distance, and with it the veneer of smart-suited respectability. But to participate in a widespread shift of social norms, merely speaking from behind that veneer is not enough. People did not stop smoking or break from the cultural dominance of the tobacco industry merely when doctors warned of the health threats – they did so when health workers themselves stopped smoking, and distanced themselves from the industry through divestment. Given the scale of intersecting fossil-fuel-driven public health emergencies – air pollution and climate change being just the most obvious – it is now unambiguously time for health workers to act.